In a fiery article with a striking title, “Beware of the Greed of a Non-National Liberal Current… Predation is Its Method”, former minister Aziz Rabbah issues a stern warning against a liberal current he describes as “predatory,” accusing it of undermining national constants and exploiting public resources for private gain.
Rabbah offers a sharp critical perspective on this current, which claims to embody openness and modernity while practicing monopoly and exploitation. What are the dimensions of this warning? Are these accusations valid? And how can this discourse be understood within its political and economic context?
1. The Predatory Liberal Current: Who Are They?
Rabbah describes the predatory liberal current as a group that has infiltrated official and unofficial institutions, from administration to media, art, and the economy. According to him, this current does not believe in diversity or openness but works to perpetuate nepotism and interest-based relationships. However, a question arises: Can this current be precisely identified? Are all liberals “predators”? Or is Rabbah using this term to describe a specific category of economic and political elites?
2. Economic Predation: Monopoly and Resource Drain
Rabbah focuses on the economic aspect of this current, accusing it of monopolizing markets, rejecting competition, laundering money, and benefiting from government incentives without fulfilling obligations. This accusation raises questions about the state’s role in regulating markets: Has the state failed to control the economy? Or are there hidden forces working to undermine its policies? Do these accusations constitute an implicit critique of past liberal policies in which Rabbah himself participated?
3. The Paradox Between Appearance and Practice
Rabbah highlights a striking paradox in this current’s behavior: it presents itself as modern, advocating democracy and social justice, while practicing predation behind the scenes. This paradox raises questions about the nature of these elites’ public discourse: Are they merely masks to hide their interests? And how can the public distinguish between authentic and deceptive rhetoric?
4. The Role of the State: Proposed Solutions
Rabbah emphasizes the need for state intervention to counter this current by strengthening regulatory institutions, combating monopolies, and imposing strict conditions on candidates for public office. But can the state be the only solution? Or does the problem lie in the absence of societal accountability mechanisms? Could state intervention restrict individual and economic freedoms?
5. Political and Social Context
Rabbah’s warning comes in a challenging economic context, where Morocco suffers from high poverty and unemployment rates and a declining middle class. This discourse seems aimed at rallying public opinion against economic elites, but is it an attempt to reshape political alliances? Or merely a reaction to internal struggles between political currents?
6. A Balanced Critical Approach
While Rabbah’s warning sheds light on real issues like monopoly and money laundering, it lacks tangible evidence to support its accusations. Moreover, the use of terms like “predation” and “betrayal” creates the impression that the problem lies with specific individuals or groups rather than the economic and political system as a whole. Could this discourse be part of a strategy to justify new government policies? Or is it an attempt to redefine the concept of nationalism in the face of liberalism?
Conclusion:
Aziz Rabbah’s warning against the “predatory liberal current” opens a crucial debate on the role of economic and political elites in Morocco. While some accusations may be valid, the proposed solutions remain questionable. Can the state be the impartial guardian of the national economy? Or does the problem lie in the absence of a comprehensive vision reconciling economic freedom and social justice? Ultimately, the essential question remains: How can a development model be built to protect the nation from predation, whether liberal or otherwise?
Questions for Debate:
- Can the “predatory liberal current” be precisely defined?
- What evidence supports Rabbah’s accusations of money laundering and monopolies?
- How can the state balance economic regulation and the preservation of freedoms?
- Does this discourse reflect internal conflicts between political currents?
- What alternatives are proposed to counter “economic predation”?
Analysis by “Maroc des Civilisations”:
In the face of Morocco’s economic and social challenges, Rabbah’s warning seems to carry multiple messages—political, economic, and social. However, the success of this discourse will depend on its ability to propose concrete solutions rather than limiting itself to general accusations.
